The therapy was continued with intervals, and a year later the erstwhile patient presented herself in town, travelling in ease and safety, to personally attest her recovery. She had regained the two stones of lost weight and showed all the outward and visible signs of well- being. Internal examination revealed no pathological residues, save a narrow sinus at the summit of the funnel shaped vagina. The histology of the primary growth was that of an epithelioma.
In my book, Miracles of Healing and How They Are Done (John Murray) twenty or thirty cancer cures effected by homoeopathy may be found and hundreds of further cancer cures could easily be added form homoeopathic literature. Dr. Burfords pamphlet quotes nine cancer cures. If, as I maintain, cancer is not a local disease but a constitutional disease, a blood disease, it calls not for the destruction of the local growth, but for wise constitutional treatment in accordance with logic and common sense.
Unfortunately orthodox medicine refuses to examine the cancer cures of homoeopaths, and hopes to find “a specific” for all cancer cases. Hundreds of such specifics have been evolved and tried in the course of time and all have proved worthless. Orthodox treatment of cancer is pitiful and the attitude of orthodox doctors, surgeons and researchers towards homoeopathic treatment of cancer is pitiful. “None are so blind as those who will not see”.