HOMOEOPATHY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PRECISION


Human nature is an odd mixture of credulity and incredulity. If you tell a man that there are two hundred and seventy billion stars he will accept your word for it, but if you put up a sign “Fresh Pain” he is never satisfied until he proves it is fresh. I am hoping that all of you here gathered, interested in homoeopathy, will both believe what is to follow and put it to the test.


Human nature is an odd mixture of credulity and incredulity. If you tell a man that there are two hundred and seventy billion stars he will accept your word for it, but if you put up a sign “Fresh Pain” he is never satisfied until he proves it is fresh. I am hoping that all of you here gathered, interested in homoeopathy, will both believe what is to follow and put it to the test.

Modern medicine is proud, and justly so, of its instruments of precision; but as with many inventions, these often supplant the use of our natural faculties. An instrument, according to the dictionary, is a furtherance, an agency, a means to an end, and comes from the Latin instruere, meaning to prepare, from the same root as instruct. A secondary meaning is that of tool, which is really an ex tension of the human hand. The old- fashioned physicians could smell diphtheria or scarlet fever or typhoid upon entering the house, and even today many of us know the odor of cancer and approaching death.

But even those regular doctors whose senses are keenly alive and who combine vivid perceptions with the assiduous use of modern scientific technique, are at a loss a large part of the time and feel that their work in therapeutics is vague and only partially satisfactory. Regular medicine and much of so-called homoeopathy give drugs on the basis of diagnosis or pathology or organs affected or, at best, on what we call common symptoms such as vomiting, purging, etc.

They are oblivious of the fine distinctions between cases of similar classification. The secret of precision is in individualization and not in trying to put the parts in place of the whole. The homoeopath who is worthy of the name knows that only by being an artist can you arrive at exactitude. To give Bryonia for pneumonia,

Rhus tox. for rheumatism, Sulphur for eczema or Nux for indigestion, is not real homoeopathy. The more exact the similarity between the patients symptoms and the single remedy given, the fuller and more salient the totality of the symptoms elicited, the more swift and brilliant the cure because of the precision of the prescription.

Over and above all usual medical lore the Homoeopathic specialist has unusual and specific knowledge: of general symptoms pertaining to the patient himself as a whole; of aggravations and ameliorations as applied to each complaint (what we call modalities); of discharges, those most revealing vents of the inner man; of repercussing suppressions and their devious sequelae. In chronic work he elicits the health trends from childhood and even in the parents. From this welter of details he arrives at a totality of the symptoms.

This does not mean that he retains for final analysis every least item, although in confused cases a careful compilation is needed as a background. Then follows elimination and emphasis, what we call the evaluation of symptoms and the final choice of remedy may be based on a mere five or six striking points which characterize the person in different spheres, in somewhat the way that a caricaturist, in half a dozen lines, shows up the inner and outer nature of his subject.

Many fine prescribers claim that their grasp of a similar remedy is intuitive, but probably in addition to a sixth sense, they are using a vast unconscious store of wisdom and information and experience. The editing of our case taking is perhaps the most important point in homoeopathy; to be able to sense what is germaine, what is primordial and what is poignant in a case.

Doctors need to study botany, zoology and mineralogy, learning to enter into a substance, take on its life, pulse with its currents, read the signatures and correspondences and keep unsealed the eye of ancient knowledge. The signs are there that he who runs may read, but he must run, not half or stumble. As an illustration let us take the octopus in the aquarium with its apparent apathy, its swift rages making murky the whole ambience with its ink; its womb-like shape; its flabby, sucking tentacles. What a compelling entity is Sepia!.

The true homoeopath may not merely be accurate with the most common hundred or so remedies, but must enlarge his knowledge systematically by daily study of the materia medica in myriad books and magazines. He must search into remedy relationships and let his mind play on the free association principle. How revealing to realize that Opium, Chelidonium and Sanguinaria are of the same family, or that Apis is the animal counterpart of Natrum muriaticum!.

It must be remembered that where medicine depends upon mechanical aids, whose perfection is fallible in direct ratio to the fallibility of the interpreter of the data, precision is impossible. The best instrument of precision that I have ever encountered is true homoeopathy in skillful and devoted hands.

Elizabeth Wright Hubbard
Dr. Elizabeth Wright Hubbard (1896-1967) was born in New York City and later studied with Pierre Schmidt. She subsequently opened a practice in Boston. In 1945 she served as president of the International Hahnemannian Association. From 1959-1961 served at the first woman president of the American Institute of Homeopathy. She also was Editor of the 'Homoeopathic Recorder' the 'Journal of the American Institute of Homeopathy' and taught at the AFH postgraduate homeopathic school. She authored A Homeopathy As Art and Science, which included A Brief Study Course in Homeopathy.