TARAXACUM



We are indebted to Emeritus Professor Walker Hall and Dr. D. M. Stone, clinical pathologist in the Preventive medicine Laboratories, for advice and permission to report this case; to Dr. Peters of Ham Green Isolation Hospital for the progress notes and for pointing out the rarity of such a young patient entering the carrier state; and to Mr. T. J. Shields, B. M. A. librarian, for obtaining the references for us.

REFERENCES.

Brock, R. L. (1935). Brit. J. Surg., July, P. 321. Van Dyk, C.G.L. (1933). S. Afr. Med. J., May 13th, P. 288. Wardle, E. N. (1935). Clin. J., March, P. 121.

P. PHILLIPS, M.D., M.Sc., Ch.B.,.

Medical Superintendent, Southmead Hospital, Bristol.

$ HOMOEOPATHIC DOSAGE

[Dosage].

Homoeopathy By Dr M L Tyler.

# 1938 Dec Vol VII No 12.

^ Tyler M L.

~ Philosophy and discussion.

` ==.

PRACTICE teaches us that a single one of these smallest doses will, perhaps, in some very light cases of disease, especially in small children and delicate and very susceptible adults, be sufficient to do all that medicine so far can do; that, however, in other cases, indeed in most cases of continued as well as too far progressed, often by previous drugging complicated, as also in grave acute diseases, plainly such a minimum dose of a remedy, even in our highly dynamized potency, is insufficient to produce all the curative effects which we can possibly expect to be produced by this same remedy; for here it is undoubtedly necessary to give several of such small doses, so that the life- force may be pathogenetically changed to that degree, and the curative reaction so increased that it may be enabled to eradicate all of the original disease, which the well-selected homoeopathic remedy has the power to eradicate and completely obliterate the same through its counter action. The best-selected remedy in so small a dose, given once only, would give in some cases some relief, but not by for enough.-SAMUEL HAHNEMANN, 1833.

$ WEAK SPOT IN OUR MATERIA MEDICA

[Weak Spot].

Homoeopathy By Dr M L Tyler.

# 1938 Dec Vol VII No 12.

^ Carroll Dunham.

~ Materia Medica.

` ==.

WOMENS diseases constitute a large majority of our cases. For, at least half of the community are women; and what with the enforced illnesses contingent on maternity; upon evolution and involution, which are often attended with serious diseases; because or our modes of living, which bear so hardly upon women; upon the unequal struggle which, as yet, women are forced to maintain, who wage alone the hard battle of life-this half of the community, as the records of all of us must show, call for professional aid at least twice as often as the other. And yet, in reference to their peculiar diseases, our Materia Medica is weakest.

The reason and the remedy are not far to seek.

We have comparatively few symptoms of drug-action upon women, because comparatively few women have been provers of drugs. And the symptoms we have are lacking in precision, because our women- provers, as a rule, have been deficient in definite knowledge of the structure and physiology of the organs distinctive of their sex, and have, therefore, been to some extent incompetent observers.

They have often better described the symptoms of the respiratory organs which they possess in common with men, than of their own characteristic sexual organs; a fact not surprising, perhaps, but certainly, from the standpoint of the Materia Medica, deplorable.

This want in our Materia Medica can be supplied only by the voluntary labours of women as provers of drugs. And that their provings may possess the requisite definiteness and precision, the provers must have acquired such a degree, at least, of professional knowledge as to understand the anatomy, physiology and relations of the apparatus peculiar to their sex.

In other words, they must be for this object, at least, and to this extent, physicians. More especially is this necessary as regards the symptoms produced upon the sexual apparatus of women, since, in the work of defining and comprehending these symptoms, at least, they can receive no aid from professional men. . . .” Science of Therapeutics. Dunham.

[Dr. Dunham, among others, had that wonderful proving of Lilium tigrinum made by “more than thirty women, most of them members of the profession”. He says “the drug had been introduced into the Materia Medica by Dr. W. E. Payne, who had communicated to us just enough to show that it had a powerful specific action upon the female organism”].

$ THE LAW

[Law].

Homoeopathy By Dr M L Tyler.

# 1938 Dec Vol VII No 12.

^ Royal Hayes.

~ Philosophy and discussion.

` ==.

Read before I.H.A, Bureau of Clinical Medicine, June 19, 1937.

ROYAL E. S. HAYES, M.D.

I WAS hurried in from the office to see a patient in the next room. He certainly was very sick. It was the canary. He had been taken suddenly ill. He was lying there on his right side with eyelids closed taking note of nothing unless his cage was touched then he would look about a little.

When picked up he would revive some and when replaced in the cage he would get up on his perch and sit there awhile with eyelids half closed, then wobble and fall off, try to stand, fluttering weakly, then fall over on his right side with his legs stretched up in the air at first, then they would sink slowly down and he would lie relaxed. His little ghost was apparently exhausted and ready to depart, yet it would take a fresh hold of him and he would struggle up for a little only to have to give in again.

This was tried several times. i then learned that his supply of drinking water had been neglected (we always give him good spring water, of which he is fond) and that when given some he had drunk inordinately as if he never would stop. An unusual rotundity in the region where his vest would be seemed to verify this history. Besides the weakness he was very sleepy, there was no doubt of it.

One thing was peculiar, when well he never cared to have people near the cage except children. He was very fond of children and would meet them at the side of his cage at any time, but now he was positively comforted by the older ones. Instead of rebelling against being picked up as formerly, now he seemed to be comforted by it and liked to rest in the hand as if it comforted him.

Of course you all know the remedy. We gave him a dose of Dunhams 200th of Phosphorus. Even as we waited there a little, we could see that he was becoming less dopy, his eye brighter and he did not fall over again, so I returned to the office. in a little while shrieks from the kidlets announced, “The bird is getting better”; and he did. He did not sing any more that day but he did the next and has been at it ever since.

Success with the bird so enhanced my reputation in my family that I was called into the dinner-room again, this time to see one of the goldfish. It was said that he had been “going bad” for two weeks and now seemed to be “going out”. His age was against him, too, for he was not a spring chicken by any means. Unlike the canary, he was to sick to care which side he would lie on, nothing seemed to matter now, he had apparently collapsed and no doubt might have been covered with a cold perspiration if one could but notice it.

His respiration was very slow and shallow compared to the other fishes and at times would stop long enough to make one wonder whether he were not through for good. The white parts of him were very pale, almost transparent. No doubt if he could have spoken our language he would have asked someone to fan him. He was bloated all over and his belly terribly so, especially the forward part of it. One of the children asked if I thought he also had drunk too much water ! His eye had a cast like the ones seen in a market. The fins and tail were lifeless, they hardly moved at all. Stringy mucus hung out from the gills.

So I slipped a power of Carbo veg. 1m into his corner and would you believe it, in about five minutes his breathing had quickened, it was deeper and regular. under a little jostling with the finger he wobbled dolefully to another corner of his pen and lay there. i then forget the incident entirely until, coming down early next morning, there was that fish sporting around as lively as any in the tank. He acts perfectly normal, better than for weeks, they say.

When I see such incidents I am reminded of the scriptural reference “and one (Sparrow) shall not fall on the ground without your Father.” However childish and contrary to the facts the common interpretation of this saying may be, to me it states the immanence of evolving being and signifies that nothing ever happens within our ken that is outside of ever-present natural law.

But after a few weeks the fish was failing again. This time his expression were entirely different. The peculiarity was that although this fish was very much done up he went about his interests and duties the same as usual. That is, he tried to. He went around here and there in the tank up and down, turning this way and that constantly as all goldfish do. But all his doings were slowed down and feeble. His long fins and tail not only moved feebly but hung down all the time, showing weakness of the cerebro-spinal system.

Samuel Hahnemann
Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843) was the founder of Homoeopathy. He is called the Father of Experimental Pharmacology because he was the first physician to prepare medicines in a specialized way; proving them on healthy human beings, to determine how the medicines acted to cure diseases.

Hahnemann's three major publications chart the development of homeopathy. In the Organon of Medicine, we see the fundamentals laid out. Materia Medica Pura records the exact symptoms of the remedy provings. In his book, The Chronic Diseases, Their Peculiar Nature and Their Homoeopathic Cure, he showed us how natural diseases become chronic in nature when suppressed by improper treatment.