WHAT ABOUT TONSILS. Is it necessary to state that Homoeopathy treats the patient and, if the similimum covers the totality of the symptoms, any remedy of the Materia Medica might effect a cure? It is true that it is the long way, but it is also the best, because not only the tonsils are cured, but the patient as well.

Yes, what about tonsils? Should we take them out or not?.

There is a marked significant change in the attitude of the medical world as regards to tonsils. Todays Health, the laymans journal of the AMA, published in its May issue a provocative article by Lois Mattox Miller, which is extracted in the Readers Digest of May, entitled. “The Myth of the Terrible Tonsils”. The old custom of “tonsil snatching”, that once meant two million tonsillectomies a year, is dying a well earned death.

On this point, again, orthodox medicine rallies to the conservative view held by the Homoeopathic School, and, in presenting this paper, I thought it worthwhile to put it on the record.

Carl E. Fisher, a homoeopathic authority of the “Gay Nineties”, in his Handbook of the Diseases of Children and Their Homoeopathic Treatment, published in 1895, says, page 612: “Some physicians boast of having removed tonsils by the score, even hundreds. Bosworth goes so far as to say that the real hyper- trophic tonsillitis is never cured except by excision. Ash by follows in the same trend in suggesting that the only efficient mode of treatment is by removal.”

Fisher, reflecting the homoeopathic consensus of opinion of his time, goes on to say: “It has been my rule to save the tonsils whenever possible and by the careful application of the properly indicated remedies, I have succeeded in many cases when failure seemed certain, and especially in young children is excising rarely if ever justifiable. The condition is almost invariably due to constitutional dyscrasiae, and the removal of the tonsils does not influence these dyscrasiae in the least.” This short quotation reflects the unchanged opinions of the homoeopathic school, unchanged because experience of over half a century by thousands of homoeopaths all over the world has proved it right.

And now, consider the allopathic views in tonsils. Removal of the tonsils was mentioned first in the literature by Celsus in the year 10 A.D. He describes the operation of complete removal. In modern times, Physick of Philadelphia was the first to stress the importance of complete removal and introduced the first tonsillotome or guillotine. The rise in incidence of this operation has been one of the major phenomena of 20th century surgery. Because of the benefits obtained from some of the operations in suitable cases, doctors got over-enthusiastic and recommended tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy as a general panacea for a large majority of pediatric problems. So, tonsillectomy has become the most common procedure performed in this country, constituting about a third of all surgical operations! This is an easy operation to do badly.

The columns of the Index Medicus list a long series of articles on the subject of complications of tonsillectomy affecting almost every tissue of the body:.


1. Local haemorrhage primary or secondary.

2. Simple phlegmonous inflammation of operative origin.

3. Edema of uvula, palate or larynx.

4. Advanced phlegmon or abscess formations of the mouth.

5. Acute inflammation of regional glands.

6. Phelgmon of the neck.

7. Surgical subcutaneous emphysema.

8. Erysipelas.

9. Fracture of the styloid process.

10. Cavernous sinus thrombosis.

11. Pulmonary foreign body (teeth, pieces of instruments, sponges, tonsilloliths, blood clot).


1. Thrombophlebitis embolism.

2. Septicemia pyemia.

3. Otitis media and complications.

4. Lung abscess.

5. Hyperpyrexia.

6. Meningitis or bulbar poliomyelitis.

7. Exacerbation of organic diseases (heart, kidneys, joints).


The theory of focal sepsis has largely fallen into disrepute. Cervical adenitis as an indication for intervention, is more than doubtful, as there is evidence that cervical adenitis is less frequent in children with their tonsils than in those who have had them out.

There is no proof, either, that tonsillectomy is beneficial in reducing the frequency of colds. It can certainly be asserted that it is of no value in nephritis. Another disturbing fact is the frequency with which the operation causes, in some children, a disease which in others it is intended to cure, particularly sinusitis and otitis media.

Psychological effects of the operation is no thing to be sneezed at. Night terrors are the characteristic response in children under three; negativism and fear of the dark or of strange men in children over four (Levy, 1945).

The worst of all is the not-so-rare death under the anesthetic, if not from post operative complications. What a disaster for the doctor who has insisted on the operation without adequate indications! What are the indications?.

1. Mechanical obstruction giving rise to alteration in speech, difficulty in breathing and swallowing, that have not responded to homoeopathic treatment.

2. Recurrent peritonsillar abscesses.

3. Chronic otorrhoea and repeated attacks of serous otitis media.

4. Failure of children to gain weight when every other therapy has failed.

Regardless of the function of the normal tonsils, be it metabolic or secretory, the practical problem remains; whether the tonsils in any given child are harmful rather than valuable. According to the best modern authorities, inspection is almost valueless, but history is of paramount importance before coming to a therapeutic decision. The contraindications are:.

1. Age. It is rarely necessary to perform tonsillectomy in children under three years of age. It is not advisable before the age of six.

2. Patients having fever or albuminuria.

3. Epidemics of contagious or infectious diseases.

4. Pulmonic diseases.

5. When vascular anomalies are seen or felt in the tonsillar region.

6. Hemophilia.

7. Acute local peritonsillar abscess.

8. All conditions rendering local and general anesthesia risky.

The decision for the removal of tonsils should not rest with the school nurse, the mother, the father, aunt, neighbors and other lay persons, nor with the general practitioner. It is the nose and throat specialists business. Most of the time, the specialist is pushed into intervention by the referring general practitioner or the pediatrician. Now that public opinion is getting alerted, they might find more courage to stand by their convictions.

An incomplete operation leaves stumps or tags which are sealed over with scar tissue, thus becoming real foci for infections and the source of many of the complications mentioned above.

The homoeopathic approach is “constitutional”. Nosodes, such as the various Tuberculins, are particularly valuable and frequently indicated. In his book New Remedies, Kent states (page 107): “I have cured probably 100 cases of adenoids with Tuberculinum alone so that children breathe through the nose, and close the mouth.” Kent cautions about the poor results to be expected in cases that have been operated on.

Besides the Tuberculins, and the occasional indications for Syphilinum and Psorinum, comes the great Triad: Sulphur, Calcarea, and Lycopodium with Calcarea in the foreground. According to the homoeopathic literature, Calcarea phos. is the favorite because of its unfailing action. Next comes Iodium, mostly in its combinations: Calcarea iod., Baryta iod., Kali iod. and Mercurius iodatus flavus. Kents Repertory gives a list of 32 remedies. Boericke points out some unproven remedies worth considering in selected cases, mainly Agraphis nutans, Lobelia syphilitica, Sanguinaria nitrica and Calcarea fluorica. Dewey mentions Hydrastis and Cistus canadensis, if Calcarea phos. fails.

Is it necessary to state that Homoeopathy treats the patient and, if the similimum covers the totality of the symptoms, any remedy of the Materia Medica might effect a cure? It is true that it is the long way, but it is also the best, because not only the tonsils are cured, but the patient as well.



DR. WILLIAM B GRIGGS. [Philadelphia, Pa.]: You have just heard a really practical paper, where this man, like more of us, condemns the wholesale massacre of the childrens tonsils. There seems to be such a materialistic aspect to it, that the patient is forgotten entirely. When a person has hypertrophied tonsils, they think by cutting off a piece of meat they will cure the constitutional dyscrasia.

Many years ago when I went to Johns Hopkins every weekened to further my work in pediatrics, Dr. MacKenzie, who was the chief laryngologist there, wrote a paper on the wholesale massacre of the tonsils, and in modern days we have found it to be a fact that children who have had their tonsils removed have been victims of polio, if polio has been around. The tonsils certainly have a function and I am ignorant enough and antiquated enough to believe that the God of nature knows more than some of these doctors, and put the tonsils there for a specific purpose. They are to give the tonsillar tones to the voice, and they do, no doubt, play a part in digestion, and when you take them out you disturb the protein digestion.

In Philadelphia it is criminal to take the tonsils out of a child when poliomyelitis anterior is in progress. I have seen it and have seen terrible results from the wholesale tearing out of tonsils. I have seen specialists tear out the tonsils of a child and I have seen the child bleed to death. They go in and they make a nick in the carotid artery, and before they can sew it up, the child has bled to death. We have seen it at the Womans Homoeopathic Hospital done by throat specialists. These are undeniable, incontestable facts. I have witnessed these things.

Roger Schmidt