THE ELECTRONIC REACTIONS OF ABRAMS.–
The British Homoeopathic Journal for October, 1922, contains an interesting report by Dr. W. E. Boyd, of Glasgow, Scotland, of his investigations of the methods of Dr. Abrams, of San Francisco, California. The Boyd report was presented to the British Homoeopathic Association, under whose auspices Dr. Boyd is pursuing his investigations. We herewith publish elsewhere in this issue a letter just received from Dr. Boyd, also his article, “Drug Potency and Dr. Abrams”.
Medical bigotry and intolerance have thus far prevented Abrams from presenting his methods and principles before the profession and our friends of the O. S., more especially the Journal of the A. M. A., have not hesitated to condemn Dr. Abrams in unmeasured terms. THE HOMOEOPATHIC RECORDER does not presume to essay the role of champion for any man and holds no brief for Dr. Abrams.
It does, however, believe in fair play and in permitting both sides to a controversy to be heard. Furthermore, it seeks to withhold judgment until all the evidence has been presented and conclusions can be safely drawn. It is, therefore, for these reasons that this journal has published several articles by various writers relative to the theories of Abrams. The readers of THE HOMOEOPATHIC RECORDER are entitled to have all possible information and it is in this spirit that Dr. Boyds communication is presented.
RADIOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.–
That the roentgenologist is indispensable to the modern surgeon admits of no question. Surgical as well as medical diagnosis is often made certain when other than X-ray methods fail of decision. This is particularly true in the field of traumatic and bone surgery where the radiogram alone or the fluoroscopic screen is practically all- sufficient.
Yet, as in every other line of human endeavor, the personal equation enter very largely into the question of skill in both the purely mechanical and interpretative parts of X-ray work. As in laboratory diagnosis, physicians are often prone to rely too implicity upon artificial aids, while neglecting the evidence to be had from the older but tried methods of physical diagnosis, such as palpation, percussion, auscultation etc.
This was recently dramatically emphasized in the case of a man of 38, who, on account of some indefinite abdominal symptom, such as occasional vague pain and flatulence, was subjected to a very thorough roentgenological examination, with the resultant final diagnosis of carcinoma of the stomach. In spite of the absence of any corroborating history or symptoms, this diagnosis was concurred in by two surgeons and three physicians. The patient his family and friends were plunged into the depths of despair by the terrifying pronouncement of this august medical conclave.
Immediate operation was insisted upon and yielded to, but no cancer of any of the organs was discovered. Instead, a somewhat abnormally long and thickened, though quiescent appendix was found and triumphantly removed. The patient has lost twenty pounds in weight, one thousand dollars in lawful money and his confidence in the diagnostic ability of medical men has been rudely shattered. Nor is this by any means an isolated case. We may perhaps subscribe to the dictum that “pigs is pigs,” but roentgenologists are not always roentgenologists, as the experience related will testify.
Small wonder that the drugless cults flourish when medical science continues to furnish such glaring examples of human fallibility. Of course the moral is : “Avoid the horde of mushroom diagnostic laboratories, which exist in all large cities and instead rely upon men of known standing and ability in their special fields of laboratory diagnostic work”.
Furthermore it behooves physicians generally to include common sense, that rare commodity, in their armamentaria.
MILLEFOLIUM.–
The common yarrow is one of our bleeding remedies which it is well to know; haemorrhages from the nose, lungs, stomach, kidneys or uterus are all characteristic. As in Aconite the blood is bright red, apparently arterial, but unlike Aconite, there is no fear, anxiety or febrile reaction. We have prescribed it chiefly in haemoptysis occurring in the course of pulmonary tuberculosis and here the potencies from the 200th to the CM have been promptly effective.
Clarke in his “Dictionary of Materia Medica” gives an interesting account of the remedy, and among other things states: “Millefolium is suited to all wounds which bleed profusely, sprains and overlifting.” Hence yarrow may be classed with Arnica and other vulneraries. In pregnant women varicose veins have been relieved, but Fluoric Acid, Hamamelis, Pulsatilla and Carbo vegetabilis must especially be considered here. Clarke likewise states that Millefolium is suited to the aged, atonic and women and children.