THE VITHARMONICAL PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF CANCER AS CLINICALLY PROVED BY DIET AND A REGENERATED METABOLISM – III



This starting regeneration proves to the patient that he owns life-prolonging vital powers in spite of surgeons considering the case inoperable or demanding a dangerous operation without previous humoral regeneration and in spite of ray-specialists refusing humoral regeneration before ray-treatment.

It has been confirmed by clinicians, that even cachectic cancer patients improved their poisoned state and could leave their bed. Almost always within a short time pains have diminished or ceased without morphia.

Generally the appetite and weight have increased. The further growth of tumours has been arrested and then a retrogression started. Cailliau and Picot declared the effect of pure organ- food J. B. 5, as curative and preventive.

Any damaging or harmful effects by natural organ-food have not been observed.

Indurations or swellings of the female breast.

Geoffrey Keynes rightly wrote in the Lancet (1935, I, p. 492):.

“Many women would prefer a reasonable alternative and would seek treatment earlier if it were available”.

All women suffering from mammary, uterine, ovarian, vaginal and other troubles should in time pass at least two to three months under a strict constitutional, nutritional and digestive self- control at home before deciding to deliver their valuable body to the knife, radium or roentgen-rays.

When having the necessary energy to carry out written individually worked out directions referring to their nutritional regeneration and to keep themselves under strict self-control in this respect, they can judge themselves within a few weeks of their starting regeneration.

New examinations as probably undertaken frequently before, need not be repeated, as long as own observations clearly show progressing improvements in general health by strict diet and a complete regenerative metabolism. It is, of course, desirable, that the patients self-control is every month impartially controlled by their unprejudiced, far-sighted familys doctor.

In the first instance female patients may seriously consider p. 214 and p. 365 in Barkers New Lives for Old; also great gynaecologists condemned a frequently not justified too early surgical treatment.

In the Mayo Clinic, 74 per cent. of the patients suffering from breast cancer with metastases died within five years of course, they had not undergone a humoral regeneration. In December, 1933, in the Marie Curie Hospital of London, there were alive only one of ten breast cancer cases treated 1926-8 and only 45 of 69 treated 1929-33.

Disappointing surgical and radiological results can be prevented or greatly improved by such timely nutritional and biological treatment at home in not too neglected cases. An example where the operation of the breast had been refused and the treatment by rays did not give the desired results, may be cited:.

Adenocarcinoma of the right mamma in size of a mandarine. Aged 35 years. Operation refused. Ray-treatment of tumour and axillaries. Then tablet and ray-treatment. After one month: pains completely cease, tumour movable and smaller, general state of health “splendid”, appetite increased (2).

In this case the radiologist did not yet stop his ray-treatment; in another cases, cited later on, he finally applied only the peroral treatment.

If in such cases the patients control themselves in time nutritionally and refuse as well operation as ray-treatment before the humoral regeneration, the diminution of the tumour may take a longer time. But, as said before, the main point is, that the humoral system is regenerated in due time to prevent great dangers by a further contamination of the blood starting from the first-operated or ray-treated induration or swelling in the breast.

Not rarely in cases of breast cancer after a satisfactory first operation of one breast new cancerous appearances within a comparatively short time show the futility of the first local treatment against the general disease (see the citations from Professor Paul and others). If, then, further surgical and ray- treatment is refused, the nutritional and digestive regeneration has shown the following results:.

Age 50 years. First operation of cancer in the left breast in 1930. In January, 1935, induration in size of an hazel-nut, i.e., metastase at the right breast and axillaries. A second operation was refused. Organotherapeutic treatment J.B. 5. General health improved in February. Severe former gastric troubles cease. Appetite increased. Induration reduced. In October, 1935, no induration. General state strengthened. No further stomach troubles. The patient considers herself cured, but continues to take the tablets as preventive means. (2).

An apparently more severe case, reported upon also by an experienced radiologist, was similar:.

Age 65 years. After the operation extensions in the axillar cavity and glands with complete swellings. Heavy pains in the trachea. Distinct cachexia. Ray, tablet, psychical-treatment. After forty-days “surprising” improvement, locally as well as generally. Nearly complete disappearance of the adenes, complete restoration of the trachea, the pains cease, restoration of appetite, weight and bodily strength. Tablet treatment is continued. (3).

That even in advanced age large breast tumours can be reduced with prolonged peroral treatment, is apparent from the following cases:.

Age 71 years. Tumour size of a mans head. Treatment August till

December, 1932: tumour has the size of an apple. Metastases are not found (4).

Age 70 years. Inoperable breast cancer. Dimension 13 by 15 cm. Treatment 3 1/2 months. Tumour reduced to 9 by 8 cm. (1).

The nutrition in all these cases differed from usual British food; already 1924, J. Ellis Barker pointed out the big difference in the food of different climates.

Such results give justified hopes to women in despair, when they apply in time self-control, to delay or to avoid operations or ray-treatment and to strengthen their own vital powers. My warnings above, that it is dangerous to wait and may be then useless to treat too late too contaminated and very cachectic cases, may be repeated.

For example only highly contaminated cases have been treated by the roentgenologist Hesse (5), who apparently did not yet consider the very important nutritional basis and the damaging effect of ray-treatment on the blood-composition, but combined his ray-treatment only with the enzymatic-hormonal regeneration of the digestive tract.

For patients who decided to undergo ray-treatment and notice its damaging effects on their general health and their humoral system suffering nausea, etc., or by becoming refractory to ray effects, the nutritional and digestive regeneration at home before, during and after the blood-altering ray-treatment is of the greatest importance. Even Hesse writes on his desolate hospital cases:.

“Mammary-recurrent-tumours, having been frequently ray-treated, always again responded to the Roentgen-treatment after J.B. 5 application. In such cases one expected resistance against rays at continuous equal ray-doses” (5).

Lesions, bleeding, cancer of the womb.

Married and unmarried women suffering from uterine troubles should read at once pages 313-16 of Barkers Cancer, Surgeon and Researcher, and page 368 in New Lives for Old (John Murray). I fully agree with his treatment:.

“Cancer of the uterus is terribly frequent. In the first place it should be observed that the uterus is placed in the cavity containing the bowels and is surrounded by them. It is only natural that a poisonous bowel poisons the uterus as well.”.

Female patients have to consider before operation or ray- treatment the statistics on results.

Within five years died 70 per cent. women suffering from inoperable cervix cancer and about 30 per cent. in operated or partly operated cervix cases of the Mayo clinic.

According to the Marie Curie Hospital statistics 263 deaths from 501 cervix-cancer-cases occurred 1929-33, and in December, 1933, were 148 cervix-cases dead out of 215 cases treated 1925-8. In December, 1933, lived 5 corpus uteri cancer cases out of 12 cases treated in 1925-8 and only 45 out of 69 cases 1929-33.

The average five years survival rate is therefore without a previous humoral regeneration very low indeed. Referring to above citation from Barker and my introductory explanations I am positive, that very different statistics of breast, uterine and other cancer cures will be available, as soon as nutrition, enzymatic-hormonal digestion, former constipation and auto- intoxication, etc., are considered in time in all such cases.

That is a question of self-control by the female world thinking at present, that luxatives effects suffice. No! Natural digestion and metabolism are necessary and not artificial irritants. The total removal of old slags poisoning the organism and a complete humoral regeneration at home are required. Uterine troubles, immediately treated in this way humorally, are generally not dangerous.

It is, of course, difficult or even hardly possible to induce average surgeons to wait with or abstain from operations and rarely roentgenologists or radiologists will postpone ray- treatment, to start with a humoral regeneration.

Will Dyes