Modes of administering the remedy adopted by Hahnemann-His early external employment -Vehicles in which he gave it internally-He afterwards advises it to be always given dry-He introduces the globules- Various sizes used by him-His administration by olfaction, to supersede all other methods-Olfaction of the dry globule-Olfaction of the dissolved medicine-He returns to the giving of medicines in solution-Modes of preserving the solution- His endermic employment of medicines-His early employment of this method-His later mode of employing it-At one time he forbids its use-He afterwards recommends it strongly-Resume of Hahnemann’s methods-AEgidi proposes to give medicines in solution-Hering approves of AEgidi’s plan-He warns against stirring the solution too much-AEgidi approves of olfaction in some cases-Rau says olfaction is seldom useful-Rummel has seen it of use in certain cases-Perry advocates its employment-Gross approves of olfaction of the high potencies-Mure’s ingenious mode of giving his patients the benefit of olfaction without their knowledge- Drysdale’s mode of giving arseniuretted hydrogen-Kampfer alludes to the endermic method-Want of uniformity and rule in the administration of medicines-Practitioners generally guided by caprice or convenience- Dry vehicles for the medicine-Rotuli, pastilles, Norton’s pilules-Olfaction occasionally, useful-The endermic method-Its antiquity-Plistonicus, Dieuches, Diocles, Dioscorides, Rufus, Berengarius, Amatus-Classes of practitioners mentioned by Celsus-Lembert, Lesieur, Ahrensen on the endermic method-Madden’s experiments on the absorption of medicines- Solids-Fluids-Gases-Hering’s peculiar endermic method-Utility of the endermic method in certain cases-Mode of employing it- Inunction of medicines-The local employment of medicines- Hahnemann’s early denunciation of the local treatment of syphilis-His subsequent local treatment of other diseases-His local treatment of itch and cancer-He afterwards denounces all local treatment-Except of contusions and condylomata-Gross recommends local treatment in some cases-Schron also-Backhausen advises it in many cases-Griesselich, Veith, Koch, Mayrhofer, Segin, AEgidi, Patzack, employ it in certain cases-Trinks is not partial to it-Lippe recommends it in burns-Henriques also uses it in burns-Giving medicine by the mouth is often a local employment of it- The method is useful in some cases, but dangerous in others-Black’s ophthalmic ointment-Blake’s calendula lotion to the womb-Utility of a collyrium in ophthalmia neonatorum-Local employment of the remedy in toothache-In syphilis- In scabies-Homoeopathic pharmacy-Hahnemann’s early pharmaceutic innovations-His soluble mercury-A bad preparation- He afterwards abandons it-Want of uniformity in his first modes of preparing tincture of belladonna, opium, ipecacuanha, chamomilla, bryonia, rhus, and hyoscyamus-Lays down rules for the preparation of different substances-He occasionally deviates from these rules-He afterwards proposes a uniform process for all medicines-His mode of triturating-Hering proposes various proportions of the vehicle and drug-His economical and expeditious mode of preparing the dilutions-Vehsemeyer approves of the decimal scale-Gruner prepares medicines on this scale- Rummel suggests the proportion of 2 to 98-Relation of decimal to centesimal scale-Various works on homoeopathic pharmacy-Caspari’s dispensatory-Hartmann’s Latin translation-Buchner’s pharmacopoeia-Gruner’s pharmacopoeia-Schmid’s pharmacopoeia- Mure’s pharmaceutic propositions-His triturating machine-His apparatus for producing a vacuum-His succussion machine-Weber’s proposed to triturates all medicines up to 15-His dynamizator- Madden’s pharmaceutic suggestions-Hahnemann’s antiquated chemistry-Need of a new homoeopathic pharmacopoeia.
MODES OF ADMINISTERING THE HOMOEOPATHIC REMEDY LOCAL EMPLOYMENT OF MEDICINES HOMOEOPATHIC PHARMACEUTICS
HAVING with all due care selected the most appropriate homoeopathic remedy, and determined the magnitude of the dose, or potency of the dilution in which we deem it necessary to exhibit it, the next question that offers itself for consideration is this:- How is this medicine to be administration, in order that the patient shall derive the greatest amount of benefit from it? And we shall presently find the mode of administering a remedy admits of considerable variety, both in respect to the form in which it is given, and the part of the organism to which it is applied.
I shall now proceed to run over the modes of administration of remedies proposed and adopted by Hahnemann, and then go on to consider the variation on his modes proposed by others.