Romance Of Medicine

Serious anatomy of the human brain only began about a hundred years ago. It was not until 1832 that the Anatomy Act was passed in England, putting an end to the anomaly that young doctors were let loose upon living man but not upon the dead. In view of this undoubted fact, ridicule of homeopathic doses may well be reconsidered.

Serious anatomy of the human brain only began about a hundred years ago. It was not until 1832 that the Anatomy Act was passed in England, putting an end to the anomaly that young doctors were let loose upon living man but not upon the dead. Until then, the most that ever happened was that a barber might do a dissection while a professor stood beside him with a pointer and lectured. There was, of course, the greatest difficulty in obtaining bodies for dissection; and even the famous anatomist John Hunter was obliged to avail himself of the services of the so-called “resurrection men”. These were persons who broke open graves and vaults after dark in order to steal corpses for anatomical students. It was not until this branch of business passed all bounds that science was finally delivered from her discreditable allies.

Who knows when the release would have come had not a great scandal finally brought the traffic to an end. The origin of the scandal was in a lodging-house in Edinburgh. The keeper of this, one Hare, had begun in a small way by taking to an anatomy laboratory by night, the body of a guest who died without paying his reckoning; insisting like Shylock upon his pound of flesh, he exchanged the body for good English gold. At Surgeons Square he asked a student for Professor Munroe.

This student happened to be the pupil of another anatomist, the great Knox, so he took the man to his own professor, who paid him and expressed a wish to enter into further and permanent business relations with him. The landlord, as a good business man, could not simply trust to luck and hope that another traveller would die at his establishment; he gave a little assistance to fortune, and in the course of time he and his friend Burke slew some thirty persons, whose bodies they delivered to Professor Knox. Everything proceeded on a sound business footing – in the summer he got eight pounds and in the winter ten pounds apiece.

The undertaking grew, a branch concern was opened in Dublin, and great care was taken that the bodies should be in good condition and that there should be no external signs of violence. It is, however, a well-known fact that people in a large organization are apt in time to grow careless, and so this purveyor of anatomical specimens failed in circumspection, and one day a neighbours wife saw something of what was going on and lodged an accusation against him. Legal proceedings were instituted, and Knox, the accessory as is generally the case, got off scot free, Hare turned Kings evidence and so saved his neck, while Burke paid the penalty.


If the normal course of events is interrupted at any point, if the sugar is not deposited in the store-rooms of the liver to be ready for use when required, but if instead it gets into the blood, it will be eliminated through the urine and thus be lost to the economy of the body. The patient will vainly try to make good the loss by excessive eating and drinking; raging hunger and perpetual thirst are the most noticeable symptoms of the disease; and, moreover, sugar will be lacking where it is needed – to provide muscular activity.

This is the reason why the diabetic is always so tired. The organism tries to make shift by using up the reserve of fat for combustion, but the only result is that despite a remarkably hearty appetite, the patient gets more and more emaciated. On the other hand, sugar is found in all sorts of places where it is not required, it becomes troublesome, causes all kinds of unpleasantnesses, such as fatigue, headaches, stomach and intestinal troubles, almost unbearable irritation of the skin, as well as inflammation of the nerves; sciatica, especially when it appears on both sides, always arouses suspicion of diabetes.

For a long time medical science was very helpless in face of these symptoms. At first, since the patient was obviously losing sugar, it seemed reasonable to try to make up for this by feeding him on sugar. This proved only to aggravate matters. Hence the opposite was tried, and until a very few years ago the treatment consisted almost entirely in giving a sugarless diet. At the same time, the error in the calculation, the factor causing the disturbance, was continually sought. Which organ could it be that controlled the assimilation of sugar?.

An Englishman, Thomas Cawley, was the first to give an indication, when in 1788 he described a case of diabetes in which a morbid condition of the pancreatic gland was found. Nevertheless, Cawley was nowhere near realizing a causal connection, and another hundred years were to pass before the German scientists, von Mehring and Minkowski, discovered it.

Joesef Loebel